<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Miranda Kerr v. Paris Hilton incident actually happened in 2005</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lucire.com/insider/20071128/the-miranda-kerr-v-paris-hilton-incident-actually-happened-in-2005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lucire.com/insider/20071128/the-miranda-kerr-v-paris-hilton-incident-actually-happened-in-2005/</link>
	<description>Behind the scenes at the various editions and businesses of Lucire.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:48:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lucire: Insider &#187; Getting a good laugh over the Jennifer Hawkins nude cover non-story</title>
		<link>http://lucire.com/insider/20071128/the-miranda-kerr-v-paris-hilton-incident-actually-happened-in-2005/#comment-2932</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucire: Insider &#187; Getting a good laugh over the Jennifer Hawkins nude cover non-story</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucire.com/insider/20071128/the-miranda-kerr-v-paris-hilton-incident-actually-happened-in-2005/#comment-2932</guid>
		<description>[...] simply didn’t want to go out with another Jennifer Hawkins cover. &#160; &#160;It reminds me of an earlier (2007) Australian media gaffe about Miranda Kerr, which was also run as fact in Murdoch Press newspapers, Channel 9 and other media outlets. &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] simply didn’t want to go out with another Jennifer Hawkins cover. &nbsp; &nbsp;It reminds me of an earlier (2007) Australian media gaffe about Miranda Kerr, which was also run as fact in Murdoch Press newspapers, Channel 9 and other media outlets. &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Yan 甄爵恩</title>
		<link>http://lucire.com/insider/20071128/the-miranda-kerr-v-paris-hilton-incident-actually-happened-in-2005/#comment-2654</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Yan 甄爵恩</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucire.com/insider/20071128/the-miranda-kerr-v-paris-hilton-incident-actually-happened-in-2005/#comment-2654</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;@mcquillanator Did Stuff report it as fact originally?! I have seen some real fictions. Here’s one we tracked: http://is.gd/1dCaY.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">@mcquillanator Did Stuff report it as fact originally?! I have seen some real fictions. Here’s one we tracked: <a href="http://is.gd/1dCaY" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/1dCaY</a>.</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Yan</title>
		<link>http://lucire.com/insider/20071128/the-miranda-kerr-v-paris-hilton-incident-actually-happened-in-2005/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Yan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucire.com/insider/20071128/the-miranda-kerr-v-paris-hilton-incident-actually-happened-in-2005/#comment-213</guid>
		<description>PS.: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pedestrian.tv/blogs/view/66/what_the_-_miranda_kerr_v_pari/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pedestrian.tv&lt;/a&gt; points out the misreporting on its own site, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS.: <a href="http://www.pedestrian.tv/blogs/view/66/what_the_-_miranda_kerr_v_pari/" rel="nofollow">Pedestrian.tv</a> points out the misreporting on its own site, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
