Lucire The global fashion magazine March 21, 2009 Subscribe to the Lucire Insider feed RSS feed
Subscribe to Lucire
Lucire Insider
Lucire home page   Fashion     Volante: travel features and news   Living   Lucire: Insider blog   News headlines   Lucire Reader Forum   Subscribe to the print editions of Lucire
Shopping   Lucire Community       Lucire feedback

« | »
 

Insight about the Honda Insight

2000 Honda Insight
Above: The 2000 Honda Insight for the US market.

[Cross-posted] I get a bit bored of the —this includes The New York Times today quoting ‘analysts’—saying that the (which got way better mileage than the , and which was on sale in the US before the Prius) did not succeed because it didn’t signal to others that the was a . And that’s why the new Insight looks like a Prius.
   Bollocks. If I remember correctly, the Insight looked far more distinctive than any car on the market at the time, including the Prius. (The Honda Civic IMA Hybrid—my preference among the Japanese models—meanwhile, did look like a regular Honda Civic.)
   People have short memories. The ïŹrst Prius—the one that was on sale when the Insight was—looked like a dull econobox that seemed inspired more by the 1975 Corolla 30 than anything else. It was only the second-generation model, from 2004, that had the more familiar shape.
   Still, the environmentally conscious ïŹ‚ocked more to the Prius than the Insight, despite its granny looks. Actually, I know a few grans who would probably disapprove of the .
   The Insight was an efïŹcient small car that looked like something in the 2000s should, with its rear wheels partly covered and getting over 80 mpg (Imperial). That makes any Prius look like a gas guzzler.
   And had enough faith in its 1999 Insight to launch it in the US for the 2000 model year. It didn’t wait for years as Toyota did.
   The Insight didn’t do well because it cramped down the back, and Americans used to their SUVs and overhead-valve V8s couldn’t fathom the idea of an engine having less than a litre in cubic capacity. Consequently, Honda built around 18,000—a tiny number compared to the Prius.
   But it was far more advanced than anything Honda had ever built. Or, for that matter, anything Toyota offered. Insight had aluminium and plastic bits, a wonderful lean-burn engine, and a drag coefïŹcient of 0,25.
   This time, Honda has built a new Insight with a Prius-like shape, using stuff from its parts’ bin, and made it a bit larger. It should do well, but we shouldn’t buy the mainstream media’s assertions that it looks the way it does because its predecessor wasn’t distinctive.The new Honda Insight is unoriginal where the ïŹrst was fresh, and stylistically, it plays to expectations rather than exceeds them.
   Karmically, I wish Honda well, but the new car hardly lives up to its of ‘The Power of Dreams’ when it aims to conform. I can’t help but notice the irony, especially those who will buy the Insight because they think it makes an original statement about their green credentials.

2010 Honda Insight
Above: This time around, Honda is all about conforming with its new Insight rather than pioneering.

Related posts

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

 

QR image


 

Add to Delicious Add to Delicious | Digg This Digg it | Add to Facebook Add to Facebook
Click here for a random entry

  • Blogroll
  • Other ways you can interact
  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner


     



    Tag cloud



  • Copyright ©1997–2010 by JY&A Media, a division of Jack Yan & Associates. All rights reserved. JY&A terms and conditions and privacy policy apply to viewing this site. All prices in US dollars except where indicated. Contact us here. Powered by WordPress