Michelle Lee’s Fashion
Victim: Our LoveHate Relationship with Dressing, Shopping
and the Cost of Style (Broadway Books, 2003, $24·95)
is a must-read for anyone who has ever (a) passed judgment on someone
else’s style of dress (which would be just about all of us) or (b)
ever questioned your own personal style and what messages it sends
out to the world at large. A frequent contributor to many of the
leading fashion magazines in New York City, Ms Lee is also the 1997
winner of the William Hearst Award for Feature Writing and a damn
good writer to boot.
From cover to cover, she held my interest in a
subject I have never given more than two minutes of serious thought
in my adult life. I was happy to be an armchair critic because I
have never considered myself a fashion victim. I figured I am too
poor to fall into that category. Well, I’ve got to get over myself.
The truth is not pretty as told by Ms Lee in her
introduction, ‘we are a society hooked on-and bombarded with fashion
… Today, even the least knowledgeable consumers know the names Valentino,
Dior, Manolo Blahnik, and Fendi if they watch HBO’s
Sex and the City. Rational people are driven to near-lunacy
in their pursuit of style. You can feel it every time you cram your
feet into uncomfortable shoes and tell the salesperson, “I’ll take
them.” … Fashion has not only begun to meld with the mainstream,
it is the mainstream.’
Under the heading of various provocative chapter
titles (‘The Fashion Victim’s Ten Commandments’, ‘McFashion’, ‘Speed
Chic’, ‘The Thin Spin’, ‘Wear and Tear’, ‘Compassion in Fashion’),
she laid it all out in a coherent, well-written manner. In ‘The
Thin Spin’, she exposed society’s hypocrisy and doublespeak on the issue of models
deemed too skinny in American fashion magazines and its effect on
young impressionable girls. While it is true that fashion magazines
tend to focus on size 2 models, it is also quite true that most American
women instinctively reject the image of a plus-size model on the page
before them. It is not always true that we, as a people, desire facing
the truth all the time. Sometimes the mirror is not your friend.
My feeling, shared by Ms Lee and many others,
is that size 2 models and men in excellent physical shape internally
give us something to aspire to—while at the same time giving rise
to feelings of frustration and inadequacy when we don’t achieve
that goal. Either way, fashion magazines cannot be held entirely
responsible for all of society’s body-image woes.
The enjoyment factor of Fashion
Victim is enhanced to a higher degree with Ms Lee’s use
of humour (in certain parts), solid research (in others) and a determination
to not lay the blame game on any one person or factor. In the final
analysis, she soundly proved that we are part and parcel of the
problem ourselves. We are fashion victims because we bought into
the programme from the beginning. As consumers throughout history,
we were aware of the upside and the downside of fashion and design.
It’s now up to us reprogram ourselves to have truly realistic expectations
of clothes, make-up and society in general. A pair of Manolo Blahnik
shoes or having the latest version of the Lady Dior handbag will
improve the body’s exterior but will not change your life. And even
if it did (God forbid), you should realize that it’s a temporary
solution to a permanent problem.
Fashion Victim is one of those books that
serve as a wake up call. In my case, it now joins the late Randy
Shilt’s Conduct Unbecoming and And the Band Played on
on my bookshelf as part of my essential reading collection.
Lauren Weisberger’s much-anticipated first novel,
The
Devil Wears Prada (Doubleday–Random House, 2003, $21·95),
is at its basic level about life changes. It’s the story of Andrea
Sachs, a freshly minted college graduate, who in an unscripted life
moment, forever changed the direction she was heading in and set off
down a path she least expected to take.
Not that you, the reader or the public, would
immediately know that.
The Devil Wears Prada was published several
weeks ago under a massive cloud of overblown pre-publicity buzz
and inner-industry controversy; and had almost everyone sharpening
their knives in anticipation. The drumbeats about this book started
last summer when it was reported that Ms Weisberger received a six-figure
advance from Doubleday Books and her pedigree was exposed to the
public on The New York Post’s ‘Page Six’ gossip page. When
the premise of the book was revealed, the floodgates were open to
much speculation: is the lead character based on Vogue’s
Anna Wintour? Is Nigel based on André Leon Talley? After
all said and done, will she ever be able to eat lunch in this town
again?
Taking note of the incoming storm, I pre-ordered
my copy from Amazon.com and waited for the answers to reveal themselves.
After reading the book, the answers are: (a) not exactly; (b) very
likely; and (c) she will survive this one just fine.
Ms Weisberger’s lead character, Andrea Sachs,
was looking for a job, any job. Like most all college graduates,
she had moved back home and discovered that she much preferred the
view on the other side of the fence. Her lifelong dream and aspiration
was to write for the New Yorker magazine but fate
intervened and dealt her a cruel hand. It was a fluke that she was
called in to interview at Runway, the most successful fashion
magazine in the world but it was bad karma that she ended
up as the new assistant to Miranda Priestly, Runway’s high-profile,
wildly successful editor-in-chief. It was the job ‘a million girls
would die for’.
Because Ms Weisberger used the first person voice
to narrate the story, the reader got to feel every hurt, every moment
of joy (as few and far between as they were), every fearful moment
(of which there were many), and each and every emotion the fictitious
Ms Sachs went through in her year of servitude. I was equally as
shocked when she realized (midway through the novel) that she was
truly dealing with a particularly manipulative she-devil from hell.
Miranda was in Paris attending the haute couture fashion shows when
Andrea received an ‘urgent’ call from her. It ‘appeared’ that she
had misplaced Karl Lagerfeld’s cell phone number and she needed
it immediately. After trying to figure out what must have happened
(after all, they thought they had done everything possible to send
off in fine fashion), they discovered a horrible truth: Miranda
had the number all along. She simply wanted Andrea (in New York)
to dial the number for her and connect her to Karl, who was probably
two blocks away from where she was staying at her hotel (in Paris).
Andrea, to give her credit, really did try her
best. She rationalized and rationalized this bad behaviour until
she couldn’t see the forest for the trees. And she discovered that
she had changed—but not necessarily for the better. She forced herself
to play the designer clothing game whereas to fit in, she allowed
herself to be made over in the Runway image. She embraced
the madness around her in the hopes of just keeping her head above
water. Her relationships outside the Runway magazine offices
suffered and she didn’t have the time to fix them. Andrea Sachs
was on a rollercoaster ride to hell and couldn’t for the life of
her figure how to get off. When she did reach the point of no return,
it took all of five words (that I won’t be repeating here, thank
you) to turn the tide.
The Devil Wears Prada is not the laugh
out loud, witty read that Lynn Messina’s Fashionista is.
In fact, while she is a competent writer, Ms Weisberger would have
better served herself if she had toned down the bitterness just
a tad. It doesn’t have the moments of wonder and unexpected joy
that made The Nanny Diaries one of my favourite books in
2002. The secondary characters surrounding Andrea Sachs are not
nearly as fleshed-out as they should be. At best, she gives us surface
descriptions, which only make their connections to the main character
tenuous, to say the least.
This book elevates itself when Ms Weisberger
simply relaxes and takes us for a ride into Fashionland—without
the bitter aftertaste. I loved the way she described the closet
at the Runway magazine offices; the way people grovelled
to Andrea when they find out about her position at the magazine
(and despite her best efforts, she revels in it), the manner in
which Nigel injected some much needed over-the-top comic relief
and positive energy into the narrative. And I almost cried when
she was describing the letter from ‘Anita’ in Newark, New Jersey.
The yearning for acceptance that came through in those words will
stay with me for a long time.
As she wrote: ‘How many Anitas were out there?
Young girls with so little else in their lives that they measure
their worth, their confidence, their entire existence around the
clothes and the models they saw in Runway? I wanted to cry
for Anita and all her friends who expend so much energy trying to
mold themselves into Shalom or Stella or Carmen, trying to impress
and please and flatter the woman who would only take their letters
and roll her eyes or shrug her shoulders … without a second thought
to the girl who’d written down a piece of herself.’
Those three pages, pp. 243–5, gave me an insight
into the real Lauren Weisberger. Too bad she didn’t give us more
of that in the book.
As for that eternal question regarding the origins
of Miranda Priestly (it will follow her to her grave, I guarantee
it), I have a theory. Writers are always told to write about what
they know. Ms Weisberger knows about fashion publishing, so she
did. The fashion industry is a very fertile breeding ground for
dormant, volcano-like, out-of-control egomaniacs. So it’s a strong
possibility that the character is based partly on Ms Wintour, but
so what? I submit that the character is also an amalgamation of
personal characteristics from Diana Vreeland, Liz Tilberis, Carmel
Snow, Grace Mirabella, Kate Betts, Linda Wells, Arthur Cooper and
all the other well-known fashion industry personalities. Anna W.
wouldn’t be the first boss to torture her assistant by having him
or her bring her 16 cups of espresso until she finds one that is
perfect.
I enjoyed reading this book, warts and all, and
I look forward to reading her other works, be it a profile piece in
Vanity Fair, a fashion story in The New York Times, or
her second novel. •
Phillip D. Johnson is features’ editor of Lucire.
|
While
it is true that fashion magazines tend to focus on size 2 models,
most American women instinctively reject the image of a plus-size
model on the page before them
FROM TOP: Fashion
Victim: Our LoveHate Relationship with Dressing, Shopping
and the Cost of Style takes aim at a society obsessed with
fashion and fashion brands; The
Devil Wears Prada reveals a story about life changes.
For the traveller
Considerably
different in tack from the books reviewed in the main body
of the article, weve finished Pulpo
Paris Fashion Shopping Guide No. 1, edited
by Nina Granberg-Melin. This handy guidebook is a labour of
love, showing must-visit shops and boutiques in Paris arranged,
sensibly, by arrondissement. Each chapter introduces
the arrondissements covered and each boutique
is rated with review, price range and availability. Address,
opening hours and telephone numbers are also given. In such
a grand workthough still miraculously pocket-sizedthere
are, sadly, a few typos (Wiona Ryder on p. 86,
for instance) but its objectivity and scope are incredibly
commendable. If you are a Paris shopper, do not leave home
without this. A penny under £10 at Amazon.co.uk.
Jack Yan, Founding Publisher
|
Amazon.com links
Palmer: Fashion
People. New York: Assouline 2003, 400 pp., $29·95
$20·97
Gavenas: Color
Stories: behind the Scenes of America’s Billion-dollar Beauty Industry.
New York: Simon & Schuster 2002, 224 pp., $23 $16·10
Messina: Fashionistas.
Toronto: Red Dress Ink 2003, 288 pp., $12·95 $10·36
Lee: Fashion
Victim: Our LoveHate Relationship with Dressing, Shopping
and the Cost of Style. New York: Broadway Books 2003, 352
pp., $24·95 $17·47
Weisberger: The
Devil Wears Prada. New York: DoubledayRandom House
2003, 366 pp., $21·95 $13·17
Granberg-Melin (ed.): Pulpo
Paris Fashion Shopping Guide No. 1. Göteborg: Pulpo
Publishing 2002, 240 pp., £9·99
|