Complementing our new cover story for today on celebrity endorsements, Maria Sharapova features in videos for her range of cellphone accessories for Sony Ericsson. The Maria Sharapova Designer Collection hits stores worldwide in the third quarter. Below are views from the fashion show in London launching her line, interviews with Miss Sharapova on her inspirations and how daily events shaped them, and designer Lykke Tarsbol discusses the collaboration process with the tennis star and former Wimbledon champion.
Today on Lucire: yesterdayâs photo call in Athena, Greece for the cast and some of the crew of one of the summerâs most anticipated ?lms, Mamma Mia!. At left, Meryl Streep and Pierce Brosnan take time out to chatâone of the more personal moments during the launch. More at the article page.
Weâve had several Fiat 500 videos on file for a while and with the publication of our Car to Be Seen in story online today, it seems to be a good time to share one. The following is from the January launch of the car in London.
Above: Ruslana Korshunova as she appeared in a print advertisement for Vera Wang.
A woman committed suicide on Water Street in New York Cityâs Financial District yesterday afternoon, and the Murdoch Pressâs New York Post is reporting it was Kazakh model Ruslana Korshunova, 20.
The newspaper claims that Korshunova jumped from her ninth-storey apartment. Korshunova had been modelling in Almaty, Kazakhstan before being discovered in an in-flight magazine by a booker from Models One, Debbie Jones, says the newspaper. She was lately represented by IMG in New York and Paris.
She would have turned 21 on July 2.
Just as Googleâthe company that parodies its own logoâsent out notices to the media in 2006 on how to use its name, and suffered a small backlash from some quarters, Allergan is trying to protect its Botox trade mark by doing something similar.
  We received a letter from Allerganâs legal associate for the AsiaâPaci?c, Nicole Wilson, today, informing us that Botox is a trade mark of her employer and that it should not be used generically to describe other botulinum toxins. This makes some sense because I am not even sure if people know Botox should refer to only the Allergan product.
  The DLE brochure included with her letter details how Aspirin, Thermos and yo-yo became generic terms and includes a how-to guide for using the Botox trade mark.
  Generally, at Lucire we will signal a proper trade mark with capitalization. Hence, we write Formica and, as you see above, Aspirin and Thermos, though yo-yo has crossed the line into everyday English for us. Search around the site or in our print magazines and I am sure you will see Latex.
  We will write Google as well, and to my knowledge, we have always written Botox with a capital.
  We are asked in the letter to put the registered trade mark symbol next to Botox, which I cannot see happening because of our own house style. Basically: if we donât do it for ourselves, why should we do it for anyone else? Itâs simply not part of regular text composition. It would only, therefore, appear in advertorial if it were something we were setting.
  And if we applied the suggested standard in a fashion magazine, we would have to see the symbol at least a dozen times per page when it comes to those pages showcasing products.
  Meanwhile, the brochure gives some interesting examples that I wonder if it will be easy to enforce them in a busy sub-editing or editing situation:
Incorrect usages She is receiving Botox.
Botox the patient. (The use of Botox as a verb.) Botoxâs proprietary information ⊠(The use of Botox in the possessive.)
  We patrol the usage of our logo and name, too, telling people about the case itâs meant to be set in, so I can see where Allergan is coming from, but these are going to be tricky.
  The key to publishing is ?nding that af?nity with readers and writing in an accessible tone.
  In the ?rst example, we are meant to say, according to Allergan, âShe is receiving Botox injectionsâ or âBotox therapy.â Now weâre aware, weâll keep an eye out but this is one that I think will slip through every now and then because of common usage.
  The second one will hardly occur in written text, but I have to admit to Googling thingsâGoogle says I should say, âsearch with Googleâ. I think any change to the Googling example has come a bit too lateâbut we would never talk about Googling in reference to searching in Yahoo! or Windows Live. But I can go along with this: Botox is not a verb, and it was never conceived to be a verb. Allergan has caught this in time, I believe.
  The third one is rather unreasonable, however. To say a word cannot be formed into a possessive goes a little too far. For the second example, since the trade mark was never conceived as a verb, Allergan is right to clamp down. At a stretch, the ?rst one is tolerable and even understandable. But to limit the usage of everyday English rulesâthat this one noun is so special that it cannot be turned into a possessive? (It also asks that it not be turned into a plural, i.e. no Botoxes.)
  We do not, for example, play the game where, if a company insists that its trade mark be all uppercase, that we follow. There is a house style here, and we would open the ?oodgates if everyone insisted on their own. Even advertisers donât get greater accommodation: last year, we wrote Audi Allroad Quattro (Audi thinks the modelâs name is all lowercase).
   However, what we can de?nitely promise Allergan is that we would never refer to a rival product or anything in the botulinum toxin category that it does not make as Botoxâwhich is the same standard we apply to Lycra, Lurex and similar names that have either fallen, or are in danger of falling, into generic usage. But the third request is plain weirdâand, as far as I know, this is the only time someone has said that their trade mark cannot be turned into a possessive.
  Weâll help Allergan, but within reason.
Today was a fun day: ?ying to Pukekohe for the launch of three Audis.
  The ?rst was the Audi TTSâthe TT with a turbocharged two-litre, replacing the V6 (which I drove last year) in the New Zealand market. I always said that the car could do with this powerplant, which is also in the S3âand the TTS has the lovely ?appy-paddle gearchange. I only managed to see 210 km/h though due to my lack of experience on the Pukekohe track.
  Secondly, the Audi A3 Cabriolet, for the aspiring Laura Holts who can no longer buy a traditional, Karmann-style Volkswagen convertible. The hood is incredibly quietâI noticed virtually no difference between this and a regular A3 in driving.
  Thirdly, the Audi A3 Sportback 1·4T, in response to the demand for lower-capacity vehiclesâbut it has more power than the outgoing 1·6 and compares nicely to the two-litre.
  They will be covered in more depth in Lucire, and I will have photos from the 35 mm, but for now, here are some low-res shots via cellphone.