Itâs not that we havenât kept up with the row over the Miley Cyrus photographs taken by Annie Leibovitz for Vanity Fair, which sexualize the teenage star, but I have to draw the line somewhere when it comes to news coverage.
There are quarters in fashion publishing which would deem these photographs appropriate and artistic, just as Leibovitz claimed, and we ourselves have featured teens in and even on the cover of Lucire, lookingÂ probably older than they really are.
But if a subject comes to me and tells me that she is embarrassed by a series of photographs, and for a cover decision she may well be in the know, then thatâs good enough reason for me to haveÂ a meeting or a big ofﬁce poll about it.
And thatâs just what Cyrus, star of the beloved Hannah Montana series, has said of her half-naked bedroom shot.
In normal circumstances, this matter would be worked out privately between the Cyrus family and Vanity Fairâs publishers.
Which makes this all rather odd: has the crisis surrounding these images been manufactured? One commenter on a Murdoch Press website seems to think so and, knowing how cover decisions are made, especially those that are potentially controversial, I am seriously tempted to agree.
Reports suggest that Cyrusâs father, singer Billy Ray Cyrus, was present through most of the shoot.
What I do know is that the modelling agencies we would work with areÂ protective of their talent and we agree on manyÂ aspects of the shoot prior to starting when it involves a young girlâand that means overt sexualization is out.
For once many of the press have taken a moral high ground and that is, at least, pleasing to see, even if I have questions on their consistency. The Fairfax Press noted:
Interestingly, the op-ed in the Fairfax Press touches on similar subjects to a blog comment that I wrote in discussion with William Shepherd, a marketing expert based in Californiaâone of those smart netizens who reminds me of the days in the 1990s when most people on the ânet were of a certain intellectual level.
He wrote, on the topic of pornography in Brazil:
When I think about these words today, itâs not just the online media, as Vanity Fair and others have shown us.
I do, after all, see the irony of citing theÂ MurdochÂ Press when it popularized the page-three girl andÂ sensationalist stories founded in sex.
At the risk of offending fans of certain TV shows, I responded:
While sex is as woven in to Desperate Housewives as it was into Benny Hill, and those watching it atÂ its late hour (past the watershed?) know what to expect,Â it gets an awful lot of publicity in TV promos with their share of suggestive imagery at other times.Â OK, it wasnât the best example of a TV show (whichÂ I watchedÂ at one point), but the old Friends certainly was. I think itâs difﬁcult to disagree that we have become too obsessed with sex in our society and those early seasons of Friends depended less on characterization and more on innuendo, not often that subtle.
At the idealistic levelÂ there is nothing wrong with this when it comes toÂ showing behaviour between consenting adultsâitâs lessÂ objectionable than seeing the extreme violence that has now made it on to prime-time televisionâbut we now face the danger of it going further and further into promoting promiscuity among the young. Expand sexâs reach, and you arouseÂ greater curiosity in ourÂ youngest citizens at an earlier age. Itâs like lowering the drinking age to 18, as had happened in New Zealand: now itâs not 17-year-olds sneaking in three years beforeÂ they are legal, but 14-year-olds with fake IDs.
That curiosity around sex has always been there withÂ those who are 11 or 12, as any of you reading this will know, but the signals are telling us that as adults weÂ need to give more guidance,Â and we need to take a stand against marketing that encourages sex at a time when mentally, young people are not prepared for the consequences.
And it was interesting to read that I am not alone in my assessment; in fact mine seems ill-educated alongside that of an author who has devoted a book to the subject. Fairfax again:
As long as we sit back, tut-tut when the items make the news but fall back on not caring at other times, then we have lost yet another value. Add that to a huge list in the westâand the eastâsince the end of World War II.
If certain institutions are being so aggressive as Liebau writes, then adults need to be as aggressive. âBenign dictatorshipâ, in the words of Carr-Gregg, probably describes the families many of us hadâand we turned out all right.
It was a sort-of democracy in my household because my parents involved me in every family-affecting major decision and I earned their trust so I never had a curfew. But that was earnedâand I was probably lucky I had a good conscience or spirit guide, or something directing me.
Not everyone is so fortunate, and in this day and age, itâs not a bad idea to be strongly involved in our childrenâs lives because that moral compass no longer comes from those cohesive, homogeneous communities of old, nor does it come from the media, at least not regularly or consistently. We, the regular people, are the last and possibly only resort in our respective families.