[Cross-posted] As if Britain wasnât already sufïŹciently heading down the V for Vendetta path (remember how last year, Mr Brown seized Icelandic funds on the grounds of terrorismâanyone know an Icelandic terrorist?), along comes amendments to the big catch-all Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 where people could be arrested and imprisoned if they take a photograph of ofïŹcers âlikely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorismâ, says the British Journal of Photography.
Anything could really qualify, couldnât it? A journalist taking a photograph for a newspaper might fall foul of the provision. One time I photographed two French policemen hassling a street vendor. I never published it but it struck me that the gentleman was being hassled because he was black.
Could this be helpful to a terrorist? Probably. While my motives were to document possible racism, a terrorist could use this image to show the prejudice against non-whites in the west and encourage attacks on the occident. Lucky I didnât take the photo in Britain then.
Equally a photograph of Big Ben with a police ofïŹcer in front could be helpful to terrorists in ïŹguring out just where policemen walked on their beat. Tourists beware. You could become a crook after taking pics of HM Life Guards (no, not the BaywatchâAlerte Ă Malibu sort).
âSet to become law on 16 February, the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 amends the Terrorism Act 2000 regarding offences relating to information about members of armed forces, a member of the intelligence services, or a police ofïŹcer,â says the Journal.
âThe new set of rules, under section 76 of the 2008 Act and section 58A of the 2000 Act, will target anyone who âelicits or attempts to elicit information about (members of armed forces) ⊠which is of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorismâ.â
Someone found guilty could be liable for 10 yearsâ imprisonment and a ïŹne.
This goes to the heart of civil liberties in the United Kingdom, something already eroded over the years by the European Union and now, under the guise of anti-terrorism. If it were proposed in the United States, some would label it as âun-Americanâ, striking at the heart of their First Amendment. Well, this is un-British. Forgive me for having a memory, but when Britain was a regular terror target during the Troublesâwhen Britons were being blown up by the IRAâno such laws were required and the country muddled through.
Policies regarded as anathema when I was a child, such as a UK identity card, are now accepted; this is merely another in a long line of Labour policies of late that leave me unsurprised at the number of UK immigrants to New Zealand. Many are documented regularly at Alfred the Ordinaryâs blog, which actually has a V for Vendetta (movie) line in its header. It is becoming more appropriate by the day unless the British public stands upâand recent events have shown that, in the words of Bob the Builder (in Neil Morrisseyâs ïŹnest hour?), âYes we can.â
Above: The late Ruth Handler, Barbieâs creator, admires her creation at its 40th anniversary celebration at F. A. O. Schwarz in New York, March 9, 1999. At the time, two Barbie dolls were sold per second.
Mattelâs Barbie doll celebrates its 50th anniversary on March 9, 2009.
Barbie was launched at the New York Toy Fair on March 9, 1959, named after the daughter of Ruth Handler, president of Mattel. It was inspired by the Bild Lilli doll, which had become famous in Germany earlier in the 1950s, which Mrs Handler saw during a trip to Switzerland.
Mattel has been reaching out to the fashion press, with one of the press release quotations reading, âInspiring over four generations of women and girls, at any given moment in history Barbie is a reflection of the times and always culturally relevant. She is on-trend and classic. She is always distinctly, unapologetically ⊠Barbie.â
Do readers have any Barbie memories they would care to share? Is she a harmless toy or a harmful icon? A toy that helps girls aspire, or one that holds them to an unfair ideal?
Weâve had a few chats lately to readers about shoesâespecially ones with prints and how they would make more of a comeback.
We were very interested to see the Hetty Rose collection for the springâsummer season. Embroidery and kimono fabricsâsome are vintage and recycled, sourced from Japanâare the hallmarks of this new collection. The look is less feminine and more chunky. The collection, in our view, fits with the yearâs trend and some of the fashions weâve seen for springâsummer worldwide.
Above: Steve Ferguson in Jayshri Gandaâs T-shirt design; Miriama Kamo in CybĂšle; Maria Tutaia in Stolen Girlfriendsâ Club. Below: TV personality and the star of last yearâs acclaimed The Jaquie Brown Diaries, Jaquie Brown, in Karen Walker.
Glassons has released its 2009 T-shirts benefiting the Breast Cancer Research Trust in New Zealand.
Participating designers are Karen Walker, Kate Sylvester, Trelise Cooper, Zambesi,
CybĂšle, Ruby and, for the first time, Stolen Girlfriendsâ Club. Two members of the public have also created T-shirts: Louise Clarke of Auckland and Jayshri Ganda of Christchurch.
This yearâs theme is Think Cure and Play Your Part, and the T-shirts went on sale January 21. They will remain on sale for a few months.
A total of NZ$3·2 million has been raised for BCRT over the last seven years through the campaign.
First Lady Michelle Obama selected jewellery from American designer Loree Rodkin for her inauguration outfit.
Rodkin created jewellery for Mrs Obama for election night, the Inaugural Concert, the Kidsâ Inaugural Concert and the Inaugural Ball.
The pieces will become part of the Smithsonian Institutionâs permanent collection.
Rodkin says she found the First Ladyâs choice of her designs fitting. âFor three years I have ended all of my emails with, âChange is the only constant.â Itâs fitting my designs are now associated with First Lady, Michelle Obama,â she said in a release.
I am a big fan of this artist, who only gets better and better as the years pass. Had the pleasure of visiting Kappâs latest installation of work completed in 2008 at the opening in Santa Monica last night, and found the canvases as durable and surprising as ever. His colour palette evolves with deep layers of paint, scraped back, overpainted, rubbed out again, an archaeology in nuances of cool blues, greys, mauves, taupes, contrasted by piercing stabs of oranges and reds. The theme image, Square Crowd, is a tour de force of gestural paint applied in large scaleâtoo late to grab it, as it quickly soldâthough Chinatown (Age of Man), a 60-by-48-inch allegory has seductive content and some racy visual wit along with an adventurous composition. Thereâs a fine, small work just to the left of the entry, which could easily have been painted by an AbEx artist, if it didnât have the solid trappings of figuration. Mostly itâs a colour field painting in modest scale, and a super bargain for a work by one who counts NYCâs Metropolitan Museum of Art as a collector. Thereâs still time to look at the show, which stays up until February 21.âStanley Moss
Ruth Bachofner Gallery
2525 Michigan Avenue, Suite G2
in the Bergamot Station Art Center
(adjacent to Santa Monica Museum of Art)
Santa Monica, CA 90404
USA
Telephone 1 310 829-3300
The Opel Insignia has done very well for GMâsuch a shame it has come while the company is in such a deep crisis. It took home the 2008 Car of the Year award from European journalists, as we reported last year. It has also won the ADAC (German Automobile Association) Gelben Engel award on January 15 in MĂŒnchen, received by Carl-Peter Forster, General Motors VP and President of GM Europe. For those who have not seen the Insignia, below is a new video shot in London.